This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Werner, O. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

How to Reduce an Unwritten Language to Writing: III. Phonetic Similarity, Suspicious Pairs, and Minimal Pairs

Northwestern University

Phonetic analysis can be done with a short list of a few hundred words. First, carefully transcribe the list phonetically. Second, list the inventory of symbols. Third, tabulate the symbols by their articulatory position. Fourth, declare symbols in close articulatory proximity, that is, sounds of great phonetic similarity, as suspicious pairs. Finally, find two words with different meanings that are phonetically identical except for one member of a suspicious pair in each. Finding such a minimal pair implies that we have found a phoneme (writing symbol).

Field Methods, Vol. 13, No. 1, 97-102 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/1525822X0101300106


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. A. Berlin and B. Berlin Some Field Methods in Medical Ethnobiology Field Methods, August 1, 2005; 17(3): 235 - 268. [Abstract] [PDF]

				O. Werner How to Reduce an Unwritten Language to Writing: V. Problems with Phonemes Field Methods, August 1, 2002; 14(3): 337 - 342. [Abstract] [PDF]

				O. Werner How to Reduce an Unwritten Language to Writing: IV. Complementary Distribution Field Methods, May 1, 2002; 14(2): 217 - 227. [Abstract] [PDF]