This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Fricker, R. D. Articles by Schonlau, M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Advantages and Disadvantages of Internet Research Surveys: Evidence from the Literature

RAND

Matthias Schonlau

RAND

E-mail and World Wide Web surveys have been the subject of much hyperbole about their capabilities as well as some criticism of their limitations. In this report, the authors examine what is known and not known about the use of the Internet for surveying. Specifically, they consider evidence in the literature regarding response rates, timeliness, data quality, and cost. Using this evidence, the authors evaluate popular claims that Internet-based surveys can be conducted more quickly, effectively, cheaply, and/or easily than surveys conducted via conventional modes. They find that the realities of cost and speed often do not live up to the hype. Nonetheless, it is possible to implement Internet-based surveys in ways that are effective and cost-efficient. The authors conclude that the Internet will continue to grow in importance for conducting certain types of research surveys

Field Methods, Vol. 14, No. 4, 347-367 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/152582202237725


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. S. Goritz Building and managing an online panel with phpPanelAdmin Behav Res Methods, November 1, 2009; 41(4): 1177 - 1182. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. A. BARCHARD and J. WILLIAMS Practical advice for conducting ethical online experiments and questionnaires for United States psychologists Behav Res Methods, November 1, 2008; 40(4): 1111 - 1128. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T.-H. Shih and Xitao Fan Comparing Response Rates from Web and Mail Surveys: A Meta-Analysis Field Methods, August 1, 2008; 20(3): 249 - 271. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. D. Converse, E. W. Wolfe, Xiaoting Huang, and F. L. Oswald Response Rates for Mixed-Mode Surveys Using Mail and E-mail/Web American Journal of Evaluation, March 1, 2008; 29(1): 99 - 107. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. C. Thompson Internet-Mediated Networking and Academic Dependency in Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore and the United States Current Sociology, January 1, 2006; 54(1): 41 - 61. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. T. Cole Comparing Mail and Web-Based Survey Distribution Methods: Results of Surveys to Leisure Travel Retailers Journal of Travel Research, May 1, 2005; 43(4): 422 - 430. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Schonlau, K. Zapert, L. P. Simon, K. H. Sanstad, S. M. Marcus, J. Adams, M. Spranca, H. Kan, R. Turner, and S. H. Berry A Comparison Between Responses From a Propensity-Weighted Web Survey and an Identical RDD Survey Social Science Computer Review, February 1, 2004; 22(1): 128 - 138. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Schonlau, B. J. Asch, and C. Du Web Surveys as Part of a Mixed-Mode Strategy for Populations that cannot be Contacted by E-Mail Social Science Computer Review, May 1, 2003; 21(2): 218 - 222. [Abstract] [PDF]