This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Durrenberger, E. P. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Using Paired Comparisons to Measure Reciprocity

Pennsylvania State University

From ethnographic observations and interviews, the author discovered that the concept of obligation was important in structuring power relationships in Chicago union locals. This was pivotal because relationships of reciprocity underlie the politics of union locals and resistance to some programs from the international organization. Here, the author discusses how he used paired comparisons to test ethnographically derived hypotheses about the salience of concepts of reciprocity and obligation to move beyond qualitative ethnographic intuition to measure cultural concepts and test hypotheses. In conclusion, he suggests that such approaches and methods can enlighten our understanding of reciprocity.

Key Words: paired comparisons • ethnographic method • obligation • unions • organized labor • politics • reciprocity

Field Methods, Vol. 15, No. 3, 271-288 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/1525822X03255020


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. P. Durrenberger and S. Erem Checking for Relationships across Domains Measured by Triads and Paired Comparisons Field Methods, May 1, 2005; 17(2): 150 - 169. [Abstract] [PDF]