Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Field Methods
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vadez, V.
Right arrow Articles by Wilkie, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Validity of Self-Reports to Measure Deforestation: Evidence from the Bolivian Lowlands

Vincent Vadez

Brandeis University

Victoria Reyes-García

University of Florida

Ricardo Godoy

Brandeis University

Luke Williams

University of Florida

Lilian Apaza

Universidad Mayor de San Andrés

Elizabeth Byron

University of Florida

Tomás Huanca

Beni, Bolivia

William R. Leonard

Northwestern University

Eddy Pérez

Universidad Mayor de San Andrés

David Wilkie

Wildlife Conservation Society

To assess rates of deforestation, researchers typically use questionnaires. But do questionnaires provide accurate information about the extent of forest clearance by households? In this article, the authors provide data on the amount of deforestation in a Tsimane' Amerindian village (Bolivia) and assess informant error by cross-checking three different assessments: (1) a direct physical measure by a research team of each plot cleared from the forest, (2)an estimate by the household head of the entire area cleared by his household during the year before the interview, and (3)an estimate by the plot owners of the area cleared of each plot he owns. Results show a high correlation between direct measures and estimates of areas provided by informants; plot owners provided more accurate information than heads of households. Results suggest that asking Amerindians about the area of forest cleared will yield reliable estimates of deforestation.

Key Words: deforestation • indigenous people • informant accuracy • slash-and-burn agriculture • education • Tsimane' Amerindians • Bolivia

Field Methods, Vol. 15, No. 3, 289-304 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/1525822X03254847


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Field MethodsHome page
R. Godoy, V. Reyes-Garcia, S. Tanner, W. R. Leonard, T. W. McDade, and T. Huanca
Can We Trust an Adult's Estimate of Parental School Attainment? Disentangling Social Desirability Bias and Random Measurement Error
Field Methods, February 1, 2008; 20(1): 26 - 45.
[Abstract] [PDF]