This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Barroso, J. Articles by Sandelowski, M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Sample Reporting in Qualitative Studies of Women with HIV Infection

Duke University

Margarete Sandelowski

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

A key means by which readers judge the validity of both qualitative and quantitative research findings is to consider how well these findings are supported by the sample from which they were drawn. Yet as the authors discovered in the course of a systematic review of qualitative studies of women with HIV infection, relevant features of these samples are not always adequately reported or appropriately presented. Factors impeding the creation of a summary description of these women included haphazard placement of sample information throughout a research report; the misuse of variable- and case-oriented formats for organizing sample information; lack of clarity concerning the use of the same sample in multiple reports by the same investigators; and the presentation of inconsistent, irrelevant, misleading, imprecise, and/or erroneous information. These problems direct writers of qualitative research toward better ways of portraying the people taking part in their studies.

Key Words: sample reporting • qualitative metasynthesis • HIV infection • women

Field Methods, Vol. 15, No. 4, 386-404 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/1525822X03257392


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?