Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Field Methods
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rocha, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Measuring Traditional Agro-Ecological Knowledge: An Example from Peasants in the Peruvian Andes

Jorge M. Rocha

A way of operationalizing the concept of traditional agro-environmental knowledge is presented using a combination of data gathering and analysis techniques. The cultural consensus model, along with more traditional Guttman and Likert-type scaling techniques were employed to collect data on the ideas that a group of randomly sampled Andean peasant householders had regarding the best way to use their natural resources. The traditional versus nontraditional dimensionality of these shared environmental understandings was then tested against data explicitly collected to measure householders’ traditionalness.

Key Words: cultural consensus model • traditional knowledge • scaling • Andes • Peru

Field Methods, Vol. 17, No. 4, 356-372 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1525822X05275380


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?