This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Stocké, V. Articles by Hunkler, C. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Measures of Desirability Beliefs and Their Validity as Indicators for Socially Desirable Responding

University of Mannheim, Germany

Christian Hunkler

University of Mannheim, Germany

Social desirability (SD) bias is a serious threat for the quality of survey data, and SD beliefs predict the strength and direction of this bias. The validity of the most frequently used indicator for desirability beliefs, the one-point measure, depends on the neutrality and monotonic assumptions to be empirically valid. In the current study, the authors examine these completely untested assumptions by drawing on data about topics that are often the subject of survey research. These are prejudice against the elderly, charitable donations, voting in political elections, and environmental consciousness. The authors find that the neutrality assumption does not hold for substantial parts of the sample for all topics and the monotonic assumption is not valid for two of them. They introduce two new, more elaborated measures for desirability beliefs that allow for the valid prediction of SD bias when either one or both of the otherwise necessary assumptions do not hold.

Key Words: monotony assumption • neutrality assumption • response bias • social desirability • trait desirability

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?