Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Field Methods
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1525822X08323987v1
21/1/3    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harvey, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Winch, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

"They'll Change What They're Doing If They Know that You're Watching": Measuring Reactivity in Health Behavior Because of an Observer's Presence— A Case from the Peruvian Amazon

Steven A. Harvey

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and University Research Co., LLC

Maribel Paredes Olórtegui

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health

Elli Leontsini

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health

Peter J. Winch

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health

Social scientists often employ direct observation to study human behavior, but a health researcher who proposes it may face considerable skepticism from colleagues. Concerns about reactivity lead many to question the validity of observational data. Because few studies have measured reactivity, evidence to evaluate this concern is limited. The authors report results from their systematic measurement of reactivity during a Peruvian malaria prevention study. In sixty observations over nine months, observers recorded all behavior they perceived as potentially reactive. The authors then assessed reactivity using iterative coding and analysis. Although they documented 339 reactivity episodes, only two involved behaviors related to study objectives. These findings are consistent with prior research and provide additional evidence that reactivity, though common, need not bias study results. The authors suggest strategies for assessing reactivity that can help reassure skeptics and reinforce the validity of observational data.

Key Words: direct observation • Peru • reactivity • malaria • data validity • triangulation

This version was published on February 1, 2009

Field Methods, Vol. 21, No. 1, 3-25 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/1525822X08323987


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?