This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Maginn, P. J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Negotiating and Securing Access: Reflections from a Study into Urban Regeneration and Community Participation in Ethnically Diverse Neighborhoods in London, England

University of Western Australia

In the United Kingdom, there have been a plethora of scholarly investigations into community participation in urban regeneration programs. The outputs from such studies have shed theoretical and empirical light on the structure, process, nature, and extent of community participation in urban regeneration partnerships. However, there has been little discussion within the urban policy literature about methodological issues surrounding the study of community participation. Specifically, there has been no analysis of the process of securing access to, within, and through urban regeneration partnerships. This article sheds some light on the process of securing access by looking at the author's experiences of trying to negotiate access into three ethnically diverse neighborhoods in London to study the nature of community participation and power and the significance of race within urban regeneration partnerships. The author shows that negotiating access can be a lengthy and complex process as it involves developing relationships and earning the trust of a wide array of informants via asserting a portfolio of identities.

Key Words: access • rapport • urban regeneration partnerships • ethnic diversity • London

References

• Anderson, E. 1976. A place on the corner. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Atkinson, P., A. Coffey, S. Delamont, J. Lofland, and L. Lofland, eds. 2001. Handbook of ethnography. London: Sage.
• Atkinson, R. 1997. The new urban governance and urban regeneration: Managing community participation. Paper presented at the European Urban Research Association Seminar— Governing Cities: International Perspectives, Brussels, Belgium, September 18—19.
• Atkinson, R., and S. Cope. 1997. Community participation and urban regeneration in Britain. In Contested communities, ed. P. Hoggett, 201—21. Bristol, UK: Policy.
• Bernard, H.R. 2001. Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. 3rd ed. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira.
• ———, ed. 2000. Handbook of methods in cultural anthropology. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira.
• Burgess, R.G. 1991. Sponsors, gatekeepers, members and friends: Access in educational settings. In Experiencing fieldwork: An inside view of qualitative research, ed. W. B. Shaffir and R. A. Stebbins, 43—52. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
• Connolly, P., and P. Maginn. 1999. Sectarianism, children and community relations in Northern Ireland. Coleraine, Ireland: University of Ulster, Centre for the Study of Conflict.
• Department of Environment. 1994a. City challenge: Partnerships regenerating England's urban areas. London: HMSO.
• ———. 1994b. SRB bidding guidance. London: HMSO.
• ———. 1995. Involving communities in urban and rural regeneration: A guide for practitioners. London: Department of Environment.
• ———. 1996a. Partners in regeneration. London: HMSO.
• ———. 1996b. Single regeneration budget challenge fund: Rounds one & two schemes. London: Department of Environment.
• ———. 1997. Single regeneration budget challenge fund: Round 3 successful bids. London: Department of Environment.
• Duke, K. 2002. Getting beyond the "official line": Reflections on dilemmas of access, knowledge and power in researching policy networks. Journal of Social Policy 31 (1): 39—59.[CrossRef]
• Feldman, M.S., J. Bell, and M.T. Berger. 2003. Gaining access: A practical and theoretical guide for qualitative researchers. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira.
• Fortier, A. 1998. Gender, ethnicity and fieldwork: A case study. In Researching society and culture, ed. C. Seale, 48—57. London: Sage.
• Glazer, M. 1972. The research adventure: Promise and problems of fieldwork. New York: Random House.
• Hammersley, M., and P. Atkinson. 1995. Ethnography: Principle and practice. London: Routledge.
• Handwerker, W.P. 2001. Quick ethnography. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira.
• Harrington, B. 2003. The social psychology of access in ethnographic research. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 32 (5): 592—625.[Abstract]
• Hastings, A., and A. McArthur. 1995. A comparative assessment of government approaches to partnership with the local community. In Urban policy evaluation, challenges and change, ed. R. Hambleton and H. Thomas, 175—93. London: Paul Chapman.
• Lee, R.M. 1993. Doing research on sensitive topics. London: Sage.
• Liebow, E. 1967. Tally's corner: A study of Negro streetcorner men. Boston: Little, Brown.
• Maginn, P.J. 2004. Urban regeneration, community power and the (in)significance of "race." Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
• Maginn, P.J., C. Paris, and P. Gray. 1999. Accommodating Irish Travellers: The public policy gap in site provision and housing in Northern Ireland. Housing Studies 14 (4): 525—45.[CrossRef]
• Murtagh, B., and P.J. Maginn. 1995. Making a difference: Community audit of Brandywell/ Bogside, Creggan and The Fountain. Londonderry, UK: Londonderry Development Office.
• Paris, C., P. Maginn, and P. Gray. 1995. An evaluation of policies affecting Irish Travellers in Northern Ireland. Belfast: Department of the Environment (Northern Ireland).
• Raco, M. 2000. Assessing community participation in local economic development—lessons for the new urban policy. Political Geography 19 (5): 573—99.[CrossRef]
• Shaffir, W. B., and R. A. Stebbins, eds. 1991. Experiencing fieldwork: An inside view of qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
• Shaffir, W. B., R. A. Stebbins, and A. Turowetz, eds. 1980. Fieldwork experience: Qualitative approaches to social research. New York: St. Martin's.
• Sixsmith, J., M. Boneham, and J.E. Goldring. 2003. Accessing the community: Gaining insider perspectives from the outside. Qualitative Health Research 13 (4): 578—89.[Abstract]
• Smith, M., and M. Beazley. 2000. Progressive regimes, partnerships and the involvement of local communities: A framework for evaluation. Public Administration 78 (4): 855—78.[CrossRef]
• Stanfield, J.H. 1993. Methodological reflections: An introduction. In Race and ethnicity in research methods, ed. J. H. Stanfield and R. M. Dennis, 3—15. London: Sage.
• Taylor, M. 2002. Public policy in the community. London: Palgrave.
• Undheim, T.A. 2003. Getting connected: How sociologists can access the high tech elite. The Qualitative Report 8 (1): 104—28, http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR8-1/undheim.pdf (accessed October 2, 2006).
• Wax, R.H. 1971. Doing fieldwork: Warnings and advice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Whyte, W.F. 1943. Street corner society: The social structure of an Italian slum. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

CiteULike

Connotea

Del.icio.us

Digg

Reddit

Technorati

This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Maginn, P. J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?